Are determination immoderate different transaction codes that person the aforesaid functionality arsenic /SCWM/PRDVC (Presentation Device Update)?
Background: Customer is presently utilizing transaction codification /SCWM/PRDVC. When implementing authorization roles done PFCG, the authorization entity S_TRANSPRT (Transport-related authorization object) is included. It is assumed that this transaction codification is really an SM30, and frankincense the transport-related authorization entity is automatically suggested. As the volition is to usage this successful a accumulation situation without obtaining transport requests, lawsuit is considering adopting different transaction codification that is not related to transport petition acquisition if available.