Appreciate your help and insights connected this issue. I've acceptable the scope for the income bid cheque (Rule A) to see lone disposable banal and exclude different supplies similar acquisition orders (POs) and accumulation orders. However, the ATP (Available-to-Promise) cheque isn't aligning with our concern requirements (Attached for speedy reference) . Let maine exemplify with a hypothetical scenario:
Let america accidental Currently, determination are 10 units disposable successful unrestricted inventory. If I make 2 oregon much income orders with today's day arsenic archetypal day successful the income bid and each bid for a quantity of 10 oregon more, each orders are confirmed for 10 units, and the remaining quantity is based connected the Replenishment Lead Time (RLT) from the worldly master.
After executing transactions V_V2 and V_V1, nary recommendations are being generated. Our anticipation is that erstwhile income bid 1 is confirmed for 10 units, consequent orders should beryllium discarded for the disposable inventory of 10 , and ATP should beryllium recalculated based connected the Replenishment Lead Time.