Purchase dilemma (XUV 400 Vs NEXON)- need help !

Hey Team,

Need immoderate information based assistance for determination making - trying to support the backmost crushed little !

Wifey was alloted a institution car with a fund of astir 19/20 lakhs ex showroom, we unfastened discussions with each cars connected the radar and dropped immoderate Chinese/Korean models owed to information concerns (personal acquisition successful a OEM) , adjacent to beryllium dropped was each non 5* rated cars that fundamentally near america a which a minuscule shortlist ! since we person a Honda metropolis astatine location we said good immoderate SUV preferably but if nary prime past a sedan is bully to go.

Wife is claustrophobic and prefers spacious windows and much compartment abstraction per se and is usually seated backseat erstwhile her operator drives , erstwhile the idiosyncratic operator drives (me the husband) she is successful the beforehand spot which is cleanable for her but lets telephone it rear spot claustrophobia.

we did see the elevate and that got booted retired simply owed to the acheronian interiors and the SA said usage airy spot covers which we did not privation to bash considering the spot airbags and I was not excessively keen connected messing with airbags etc .

long communicative abbreviated we person arrived astatine XUV 400 and NEXON EV some agelong scope and airy colour interiors and I americium besides gladsome its a EV for we person a ICE astatine location for longer hauls if request beryllium and with aged parents (they mightiness find the SUV stance higher to ascent in) truthful the City covers that.

Test driven some 400 and Nexon and good with both, we genuinely fto the 400 was a batch much spacious - some are successful the 275/300 km scope successful metropolis (usuable range) and thats acceptable arsenic well.

Questions :

1. Both the artillery chemistry are antithetic portion they some connection 8 twelvemonth 1.6 lakh km warranty - which is amended successful the agelong word ( we are talking accidental 8/9 years tops with astir accidental 25000 km max tally annually).

2. The regen if the TATA is overmuch stronger much selectable and felt similar azygous pedal driving successful postulation was much doable and 400 did not person a enactment to prime regen per se - however important is that for scope and retired of presumption driving !

3. Reliability of some artillery setups.

4. We besides mean to bash 500/700 km runs surely with the EV and tin program it our accordingly.

5. I work determination that it's amended not to complaint the NMC artillery (XUV 400) beyond 80 regularly for amended beingness and reliability , is that adjacent applicable ? reasoning wherefore I would commencement with 80% erstwhile I tin commencement with 100% SOC ?

we did besides see the PUNCH EV which was acceptable and tin precise overmuch beryllium a portion of the premix if it truthful evolves to beryllium - nary crushed wherefore it has to beryllium kept retired , ticks each boxes excessively - whitethorn lone inhibit retired presumption question somewhat but thats that

Thanks folks for each the assistance and if immoderate of these are basal questions I apologise amended to get feedback from the experts than conjecture I thought

Srini

Last edited by Srini76 : 4th June 2024 astatine 15:07.