Hey Guys! agelong clip listener, archetypal clip caller. lol
I’m seeking proposal connected handling a unsocial situation with SAP IBP regarding dynamic determination assignments for components wrong a BOM structure.
Problem Overview:
We are utilizing Salesforce to nonstop implicit merchandise ID and determination ID combinations astatine the BOM level. The process is arsenic follows:
- Salesforce sends the BOM (e.g., BOM 1234) with associated components, including circumstantial determination IDs wherever each constituent should beryllium sourced (e.g., Part XYZ from Location ID 10).
- Simultaneously, different BOM (e.g., BOM 4567) with the aforesaid constituent (Part XYZ) whitethorn necessitate sourcing from a antithetic determination (e.g., Location ID 150).
- The information is past sent to IBP for Demand Planning, wherever the BOM operation is breached down to the constituent level utilizing a customized bom explosion, and the request is passed to IBP Supply Planning astatine the merchandise + determination level to make nett requirements based connected each circumstantial location.
Challenge:
Since SAP IBP maestro information typically restricts each merchandise ID to a azygous determination ID, I'm facing a constraint: I request to accurately seizure and program for shared components sourced from aggregate locations without merging oregon aggregating the request crossed locations. In different words, I request to separate betwixt the aforesaid constituent successful antithetic BOMs based connected determination ID dynamically without duplicating maestro data.
Question:
What are the champion approaches for managing dynamic determination IDs for shared components crossed BOMs successful SAP IBP? Are determination immoderate recommended solutions, specified arsenic utilizing Attribute arsenic a Key Figure (AAKF), customized readying levels, oregon different method that could lick this issue?
Thanks successful advance!
#SAPIBP#DemandPlanning#SupplyPlanning#MasterData#AttributeAsKeyFigure#BOMPlanning#SalesforceIntegration#DynamicAttributes#PlanningOptimization#LocationManagement