Issue with address inconsistencies when synchronizing Employee to Business Partner

Hi Gurus, I person been requested to lick an contented related to a BP successful S4 connected premise.

To springiness context: We had a BP not synchronized correctly with its worker fig (from PA30).

Our functional squad executed RSUID_REMOVE_FALSE_BP_ASGN to unlink them and erstwhile executing /SHCM/RH_SYNC_BUPA_EMPL_SINGLE to generate a caller BP and nexus it with the worker fig we received the pursuing 2 mistake logs:

Message R1000 "Error_Time Dependency_Addresses ADVW_VALIDITY_ERROR"

Message R11245 "Error for validity periods of code usages"

I person checked the address' validity periods successful the HR maestro (PA30) and the BP and they match, besides I person checked BUT020, ADRC and PA0006 tables and they lucifer too. 

Reading sap note 2578294, it suggests to review the way "Cross-Application Components=>SAP Business Partner=>Business Partner=>Basic Settings=>Address Determination" and marque sure the code type XXDEFAULT is acceptable connected "Assign Transaction to Address Type", and it is. Also I person checked sap notes 2517507 and 2598468, but they cannot beryllium implemented successful the system. 

Going on, we person executed again /SHCM/RH_SYNC_BUPA_EMPL_SINGLE but with the emblem "Override Banks, addresses and roles" and it gives america a antithetic mistake log:

Message no. AM266 Personal code not deleted; different notation exists.

Searching for it I person recovered this blog: https://community.sap.com/t5/crm-and-cx-questions/bupa-del-error/qaq-p/10741420, it says that the error generally occurs for the addresses  of array BCST_CAM, I person checked it and determination isn't immoderate introduction for the worker number, could that beryllium the problem? Going trough note 835936, I person executed RSBCS_ADDRESS_REFERENCE, but it says that determination isn't immoderate reference. 

Does idiosyncratic cognize what other tin I do? Or however should I proceed? 

Thank you successful advance.