Dropshipment flow: exicises managment MM and SD

Dear experts,

our lawsuit is utilizing the dropshipment travel without issues. Now, a caller request is coming. One institution placed successful USA needs to instrumentality the outgo of the excises into the PO and past successful the lawsuit billing. The supplier archetypal pays successful beforehand the excises to the California Government, the the lawsuit pays the supplier and astatine the extremity the lawsuit pays the company.

I person acceptable up the surcharges information successful the SD and it is fine. I person occupation connected the MM side. I person followed immoderate forum and I person created a statistical information successful the PO defined arsenic freight. Then the amounts are posted some successful the MIGO and successful the MIRO. If I look to the FS10N GL relationship balance report I spot a "strange" situation. I person the point of the MIGO and MIRO successful "compensation" (sorry for the bas presumption but I americium not a FI consultant) and past I person the enactment of the lawsuit not closed. The expection is to person successful the FS10N GL relationship balance the magnitude 0 (for the accounts wherever the exices are posted). How tin I adjacent this item? Do you suggest different approach? I person besides projected to the lawsuit to station straight the magnitude of excises successful the MIRO nether the GL relationship TAB. From an accounting constituent of presumption is good (we person lone MIRO and lawsuit billing posistions that marque the nett successful the balance) but the request is to not person manual activities.

Thanks a lot

Elena