CVI with same number range for customer and vendor in ECC to S/4HANA

Hi,

We person a Brownfield ECC to S/4HANA conversion project, successful which we usage CVI.

Unfortunately the lawsuit has the aforesaid fig scope for lawsuit and supplier (but antithetic objects DEBITOR and KREDITOR) successful ECC.

Example:

After converting to S/4HANA we are incapable to warrant 2 situations:

- 1st configuration that the caller BP's person the aforesaid fig arsenic lawsuit and vendor.

- 2nd besides guarantee the enlargement of aged customers to suppliers. In the pursuing example, when expanding a lawsuit 100692 to vendor (in S/4HANA), it indicates that the vendor already exists astatine that ID:

Any suggestions connected however to flooded this concern successful ECC (before CVI) oregon aft conversion CVI S/4Hana?

Best Regards,

Daniel Cunha