Dear gurus,
we bash transverse institution banal transportation orders (STO). The process works conscionable fine, but we came on 1 unusual thing:
For billing, we defined a pricing process akin to modular ICAA01, but with conscionable 1 (!) terms condition, information benignant P101. Price root was acceptable to A (Purchase Order) to transcript the information worth for P101 from the STO to the billing document.
Now, erstwhile we make a billing document, determination are 2 (!) rows for information benignant P101.
The archetypal 1 is marked reddish (incorrect), it has a worth of zero. Further values:
Condition class: B Prices
Calculat.Type: C Quantity
Condit.Category: H Basic price
Cond.Control: A Adjust for quantity variance
Condit.Origin: A Automatic Pricing
Inactive: X Inactive vie formulas oregon incorrect
The 2nd P101 works conscionable arsenic planned, the information worth is copied from the STO and Price Source is A (Purchase order). Further values:
Condition class: B Prices
Calculat.Type: C Quantity
Condit.Category: G Internal price
Cond.Control: H Condition worth fixed (cost price)
Condit.Origin: A Automatic Pricing
Now my questions: Why is the archetypal enactment generated and wherefore is it incorrect?
Any ideas?
Thanks
Jens